Caution Wet Floor sign on wet tile in busy shopping mall corridor

What Does Modified Comparative Fault Mean for Indianapolis Falls?

How Modified Comparative Fault Affects Your Indianapolis Slip and Fall Case If you slipped and fell on someone else’s property in Indianapolis, you may wonder whether you can still recover compensation if you were partially at fault. Indiana’s modified comparative fault system under IC 34-51-2 determines how fault is divided and affects your potential recovery…. Read more »

Law firm reception desk with attorneys and clients in modern waiting area

New Indianapolis Law Firm Merger Signals Growth in Injury Cases

A fresh set of federal traffic-fatality numbers is shaping how injury lawyers, insurers, and courts discuss risk, damages, and public safety in 2026. On April 1, 2026, NHTSA announced traffic deaths continued to decline in 2025, while releasing final 2024 fatality data. Although these figures concern motor-vehicle deaths rather than premises incidents, they influence how… Read more »

Unable to access provided image URL to verify visible content accurately

Can a Mooresville Store Be Liable for a Wet Floor Fall?

Yes, a Mooresville store can be held liable for a wet floor fall, but only if you can establish negligence. Simply falling inside a business does not automatically entitle you to compensation. You must show the store knew or should have known about the hazardous condition and failed to act. Under premises liability law, stores… Read more »

Image unavailable from provided URL, unable to verify visible elements accurately

What Is Premises Liability in an Indianapolis Slip and Fall Case?

Premises liability is the legal principle that holds property owners responsible when unsafe conditions on their property cause injuries to visitors. If you slipped and fell in an Indianapolis grocery store, parking lot, restaurant, or apartment complex, Indiana premises liability law may entitle you to compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and pain and… Read more »

Wet floor caution sign in office lobby with worker near elevators

How to Document a Slip and Fall Injury in Indianapolis

If you slipped and fell on someone else’s property in Indianapolis, the steps you take immediately afterward can make or break your claim. Thorough documentation establishes the property owner’s liability and protects your right to fair compensation under Indiana law. Whether you tripped on a broken sidewalk, slipped on a wet floor, or fell in… Read more »

Curved road leading through forested mountains beneath cloudy sky

Can A Slip And Fall Case Succeed Without Proof Of Actual Notice In Indiana?

Yes, a slip and fall case in Indiana can succeed without proving the property owner had direct knowledge of the hazard. Indiana law recognizes constructive notice, meaning a property owner may be liable if they should have known about a dangerous condition. This is important for injured individuals in Indianapolis who believe their case is… Read more »

Cleaning worker mopping floor beside caution wet floor sign and cleaning cart

What Evidence Strengthens a Slip and Fall Case in Indianapolis?

Strong evidence can make or break a slip and fall case in Indianapolis. If you slipped on a wet floor, tripped over a broken sidewalk, or fell in a poorly maintained parking lot, the quality of evidence you gather directly affects whether you can recover compensation. Indiana law places specific requirements on how fault is… Read more »

Can Indiana Property Owners Be Liable for Parking Lot Falls?

Yes, Indiana property owners can generally be held liable when unsafe parking lot conditions cause someone to fall and suffer injuries. Under Indiana premises liability law, property owners owe a legal duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions for lawful visitors. When they fail to address hazards like potholes, cracked pavement, or icy surfaces, they may… Read more »

Indiana Supreme Court Hears Key Premises Liability Case in 2026

On January 15, 2026, the Indiana Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that may redefine how property owners across the state are held accountable when visitors are injured on their premises. The case, Simon Property Group, L.P. v. Kaya P.R. Stewart, et al. (No. 24A-CT-01700), centers on the 2022 Greenwood Park Mall shooting… Read more »